This project might be open to known security vulnerabilities, which can be prevented by tightening the version range of affected dependencies. Find detailed information at the bottom.
Unix-like operating systems may segfault due to dereferencing a dangling pointer in specific circumstances. This requires an environment variable to be set in a different thread than the affected functions. This may occur without the user's knowledge, notably in a third-party library.
When unpacking a tarball that contains a symlink the tar crate may create
directories outside of the directory it's supposed to unpack into.
The function errors when it's trying to create a file, but the folders are
already created at this point.
use std::{io, io::Result};
use tar::{Archive, Builder, EntryType, Header};
fn main() -> Result<()> {
let mut buf = Vec::new();
{
let mut builder = Builder::new(&mut buf);
// symlink: parent -> ..
let mut header = Header::new_gnu();
header.set_path("symlink")?;
header.set_link_name("..")?;
header.set_entry_type(EntryType::Symlink);
header.set_size(0);
header.set_cksum();
builder.append(&header, io::empty())?;
// file: symlink/exploit/foo/bar
let mut header = Header::new_gnu();
header.set_path("symlink/exploit/foo/bar")?;
header.set_size(0);
header.set_cksum();
builder.append(&header, io::empty())?;
builder.finish()?;
};
Archive::new(&*buf).unpack("demo")
}
This has been fixed in https://github.com/alexcrichton/tar-rs/pull/259 and is
published as tar 0.4.36. Thanks to Martin Michaelis (@mgjm) for discovering
and reporting this, and Nikhil Benesch (@benesch) for the fix!
regex: Regexes with large repetitions on empty sub-expressions take a very long time to parse
The Rust Security Response WG was notified that the regex crate did not
properly limit the complexity of the regular expressions (regex) it parses. An
attacker could use this security issue to perform a denial of service, by
sending a specially crafted regex to a service accepting untrusted regexes. No
known vulnerability is present when parsing untrusted input with trusted
regexes.
This issue has been assigned CVE-2022-24713. The severity of this vulnerability
is "high" when the regex crate is used to parse untrusted regexes. Other uses
of the regex crate are not affected by this vulnerability.
Overview
The regex crate features built-in mitigations to prevent denial of service
attacks caused by untrusted regexes, or untrusted input matched by trusted
regexes. Those (tunable) mitigations already provide sane defaults to prevent
attacks. This guarantee is documented and it's considered part of the crate's
API.
Unfortunately a bug was discovered in the mitigations designed to prevent
untrusted regexes to take an arbitrary amount of time during parsing, and it's
possible to craft regexes that bypass such mitigations. This makes it possible
to perform denial of service attacks by sending specially crafted regexes to
services accepting user-controlled, untrusted regexes.
Affected versions
All versions of the regex crate before or equal to 1.5.4 are affected by this
issue. The fix is include starting from regex 1.5.5.
Mitigations
We recommend everyone accepting user-controlled regexes to upgrade immediately
to the latest version of the regex crate.
Unfortunately there is no fixed set of problematic regexes, as there are
practically infinite regexes that could be crafted to exploit this
vulnerability. Because of this, we do not recommend denying known problematic
regexes.
Acknowledgements
We want to thank Addison Crump for responsibly disclosing this to us according
to the Rust security policy, and for helping review the fix.
We also want to thank Andrew Gallant for developing the fix, and Pietro Albini
for coordinating the disclosure and writing this advisory.
In the AES GCM implementation of decrypt_in_place_detached,
the decrypted ciphertext (i.e. the correct plaintext) is
exposed even if tag verification fails.
Impact
If a program using the aes-gcm crate's decrypt_in_place*
APIs accesses the buffer after decryption failure, it will
contain a decryption of an unauthenticated input. Depending
on the specific nature of the program this may enable
Chosen Ciphertext Attacks (CCAs) which can cause a
catastrophic breakage of the cipher including full
plaintext recovery.
Details
As seen in the implementation of decrypt_in_place_detached for
AES GCM, if the tag verification fails, an error is returned.
Because the decryption of the ciphertext is done in place,
the plaintext contents are now exposed via buffer.
This should ideally not be the case - as noted in page 17 of
NIST's publication Recommendation for Block Cipher Modes of
Operation: Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) and GMAC:
In Step 8, the result of Step 7 is compared with the
authentication tag that was received as an input: if
they are identical, then the plaintext is returned;
otherwise,FAIL is returned.
This is seems correctly addressed in the AES GCM SIV
implementation, where the decrypted buffer is encrypted
again before the error is returned - this fix is
straightforward to implement in AES GCM. To ensure that
these types of cases are covered during testing, it
would be valuable to add test cases like 23, 24 etc
from project wycheproof to ensure that when a bad tag
is used, there is an error on decryption and that the
plaintext value is not exposed.
PoC
To reproduce this issue, I'm using test case 23 from
project wycheproof.
let key = GenericArray::from_slice(&hex!("000102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f"));
let nonce = GenericArray::from_slice(&hex!("505152535455565758595a5b"));
let tag = GenericArray::from_slice(&hex!("d9847dbc326a06e988c77ad3863e6083")); // bad tag
let mut ct = hex!("eb156d081ed6b6b55f4612f021d87b39");
let msg = hex!("202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f");
let aad = hex!("");
let cipher = Aes128Gcm::new(&key);
let _plaintext = cipher.decrypt_in_place_detached(&nonce, &aad, &mut ct, &tag);
assert_eq!(ct, msg);
rustls: rustls network-reachable panic in `Acceptor::accept`
A bug introduced in rustls 0.23.13 leads to a panic if the received
TLS ClientHello is fragmented. Only servers that use
rustls::server::Acceptor::accept() are affected.
Servers that use tokio-rustls's LazyConfigAcceptor API are affected.
Servers that use tokio-rustls's TlsAcceptor API are not affected.
Servers that use rustls-ffi's rustls_acceptor_accept API are affected.