This project might be open to known security vulnerabilities, which can be prevented by tightening the version range of affected dependencies. Find detailed information at the bottom.

Crate cli-batteries

Dependencies

(42 total, 14 outdated, 3 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 ansi_term^0.12.10.12.1up to date
 chrono ⚠️^0.40.4.38maybe insecure
 clap^4.04.5.21up to date
 color-eyre^0.60.6.3up to date
 criterion^0.40.5.1out of date
 eyre ⚠️^0.60.6.12maybe insecure
 futures^0.30.3.31up to date
 hex^0.4.30.4.3up to date
 hex-literal^0.40.4.1up to date
 itertools^0.100.13.0out of date
 once_cell^1.121.20.2up to date
 proptest^1.01.5.0up to date
 thiserror^1.02.0.3out of date
 tokio ⚠️^1.171.41.1maybe insecure
 tracing^0.10.1.40up to date
 tracing-serde^0.10.1.3up to date
 tracing-log^0.1.30.2.0out of date
 tracing-error^0.20.2.0up to date
 tracing-futures^0.20.2.5up to date
 tracing-subscriber^0.3.170.3.18up to date
 tracing-flame^0.2.00.2.0up to date
 users^0.110.11.0up to date
 url^2.22.5.4up to date
 console-subscriber^0.10.4.1out of date
 mimalloc^0.10.1.43up to date
 rand^0.8.50.8.5up to date
 rand_chacha^0.3.10.3.1up to date
 rayon^1.5.31.10.0up to date
 num_cpus^1.13.11.16.0up to date
 prometheus^0.130.13.4up to date
 hyper^0.14.171.5.1out of date
 serde^1.01.0.215up to date
 serde_json^1.01.0.133up to date
 tracing-opentelemetry^0.190.28.0out of date
 opentelemetry^0.190.27.0out of date
 opentelemetry-semantic-conventions^0.110.27.0out of date
 opentelemetry-http^0.80.27.0out of date
 heck^0.40.5.0out of date
 http^0.2.81.1.0out of date
 opentelemetry-otlp^0.120.27.0out of date
 opentelemetry-datadog^0.7.00.14.0out of date
 time^0.3.50.3.36up to date

Dev dependencies

(3 total, 1 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 proptest^1.01.5.0up to date
 tracing-test^0.20.2.5up to date
 tokio ⚠️^1.171.41.1maybe insecure

Security Vulnerabilities

chrono: Potential segfault in `localtime_r` invocations

RUSTSEC-2020-0159

Impact

Unix-like operating systems may segfault due to dereferencing a dangling pointer in specific circumstances. This requires an environment variable to be set in a different thread than the affected functions. This may occur without the user's knowledge, notably in a third-party library.

Workarounds

No workarounds are known.

References

tokio: reject_remote_clients Configuration corruption

RUSTSEC-2023-0001

On Windows, configuring a named pipe server with pipe_mode will force ServerOptions::reject_remote_clients as false.

This drops any intended explicit configuration for the reject_remote_clients that may have been set as true previously.

The default setting of reject_remote_clients is normally true meaning the default is also overridden as false.

Workarounds

Ensure that pipe_mode is set first after initializing a ServerOptions. For example:

let mut opts = ServerOptions::new();
opts.pipe_mode(PipeMode::Message);
opts.reject_remote_clients(true);

eyre: Parts of Report are dropped as the wrong type during downcast

RUSTSEC-2024-0021

In affected versions, after a Report is constructed using wrap_err or wrap_err_with to attach a message of type D onto an error of type E, then using downcast to recover ownership of either the value of type D or the value of type E, one of two things can go wrong:

  • If downcasting to E, there remains a value of type D to be dropped. It is incorrectly "dropped" by running E's drop behavior, rather than D's. For example if D is &str and E is std::io::Error, there would be a call of std::io::Error::drop in which the reference received by the Drop impl does not refer to a valid value of type std::io::Error, but instead to &str.

  • If downcasting to D, there remains a value of type E to be dropped. When D and E do not happen to be the same size, E's drop behavior is incorrectly executed in the wrong location. The reference received by the Drop impl may point left or right of the real E value that is meant to be getting dropped.

In both cases, when the Report contains an error E that has nontrivial drop behavior, the most likely outcome is memory corruption.

When the Report contains an error E that has trivial drop behavior (for example a Utf8Error) but where D has nontrivial drop behavior (such as String), the most likely outcome is that downcasting to E would leak D.