This project might be open to known security vulnerabilities, which can be prevented by tightening the version range of affected dependencies. Find detailed information at the bottom.

Crate tendermint-rpc

Dependencies

(28 total, 8 outdated, 4 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 async-trait^0.10.1.89up to date
 async-tungstenite^0.240.33.0out of date
 bytes ⚠️^1.01.11.1maybe insecure
 flex-error^0.4.40.4.4up to date
 futures^0.30.3.32up to date
 getrandom^0.20.4.2out of date
 peg^0.80.8.5up to date
 pin-project^1.0.11.1.11up to date
 rand^0.80.10.0out of date
 reqwest^0.11.200.13.2out of date
 semver^1.01.0.27up to date
 serde^11.0.228up to date
 serde_bytes^0.110.11.19up to date
 serde_json^11.0.149up to date
 structopt^0.30.3.26up to date
 subtle^22.6.1up to date
 subtle-encoding^0.50.5.1up to date
 tendermint^0.36.00.40.4out of date
 tendermint-config^0.36.00.40.4out of date
 tendermint-proto^0.36.00.40.4out of date
 thiserror^12.0.18out of date
 time ⚠️^0.30.3.47maybe insecure
 tokio ⚠️^1.01.50.0maybe insecure
 tracing^0.10.1.44up to date
 tracing-subscriber ⚠️^0.30.3.23maybe insecure
 url^2.4.12.5.8up to date
 uuid^1.71.22.0up to date
 walkdir^2.32.5.0up to date

Dev dependencies

(3 total, all up-to-date)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 http^11.4.0up to date
 lazy_static^1.4.01.5.0up to date
 tokio-test^0.40.4.5up to date

Security Vulnerabilities

tokio: reject_remote_clients Configuration corruption

RUSTSEC-2023-0001

On Windows, configuring a named pipe server with pipe_mode will force ServerOptions::reject_remote_clients as false.

This drops any intended explicit configuration for the reject_remote_clients that may have been set as true previously.

The default setting of reject_remote_clients is normally true meaning the default is also overridden as false.

Workarounds

Ensure that pipe_mode is set first after initializing a ServerOptions. For example:

let mut opts = ServerOptions::new();
opts.pipe_mode(PipeMode::Message);
opts.reject_remote_clients(true);

tracing-subscriber: Logging user input may result in poisoning logs with ANSI escape sequences

RUSTSEC-2025-0055

Previous versions of tracing-subscriber were vulnerable to ANSI escape sequence injection attacks. Untrusted user input containing ANSI escape sequences could be injected into terminal output when logged, potentially allowing attackers to:

  • Manipulate terminal title bars
  • Clear screens or modify terminal display
  • Potentially mislead users through terminal manipulation

In isolation, impact is minimal, however security issues have been found in terminal emulators that enabled an attacker to use ANSI escape sequences via logs to exploit vulnerabilities in the terminal emulator.

This was patched in PR #3368 to escape ANSI control characters from user input.

bytes: Integer overflow in `BytesMut::reserve`

RUSTSEC-2026-0007

In the unique reclaim path of BytesMut::reserve, the condition

if v_capacity >= new_cap + offset

uses an unchecked addition. When new_cap + offset overflows usize in release builds, this condition may incorrectly pass, causing self.cap to be set to a value that exceeds the actual allocated capacity. Subsequent APIs such as spare_capacity_mut() then trust this corrupted cap value and may create out-of-bounds slices, leading to UB.

This behavior is observable in release builds (integer overflow wraps), whereas debug builds panic due to overflow checks.

PoC

use bytes::*;

fn main() {
    let mut a = BytesMut::from(&b"hello world"[..]);
    let mut b = a.split_off(5);

    // Ensure b becomes the unique owner of the backing storage
    drop(a);

    // Trigger overflow in new_cap + offset inside reserve
    b.reserve(usize::MAX - 6);

    // This call relies on the corrupted cap and may cause UB & HBO
    b.put_u8(b'h');
}

Workarounds

Users of BytesMut::reserve are only affected if integer overflow checks are configured to wrap. When integer overflow is configured to panic, this issue does not apply.

time: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion

RUSTSEC-2026-0009

Impact

When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary, non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.

Patches

A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned rather than exhausting the stack.

Workarounds

Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.