This project might be open to known security vulnerabilities, which can be prevented by tightening the version range of affected dependencies. Find detailed information at the bottom.

Crate curv-kzen

Dependencies

(24 total, 10 outdated, 1 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 curve25519-dalek ⚠️^34.1.3out of date
 digest^0.90.10.7out of date
 generic-array^0.141.1.1out of date
 typenum^1.131.17.0up to date
 ff-zeroize^0.6.30.6.3up to date
 hex^0.40.4.3up to date
 hmac^0.110.12.1out of date
 thiserror^12.0.9out of date
 lazy_static^1.41.5.0up to date
 num-traits^0.20.2.19up to date
 num-integer^0.10.1.46up to date
 pairing-plus^0.190.19.0up to date
 rand^0.60.8.5out of date
 serde^1.01.0.216up to date
 serde_bytes^0.110.11.15up to date
 serde_derive^1.01.0.216up to date
 sha2^0.80.10.8out of date
 sha3^0.90.10.8out of date
 zeroize^11.8.1up to date
 merkle-cbt^0.30.3.2up to date
 rust-gmp-kzen^0.50.5.1up to date
 num-bigint^0.40.4.6up to date
 secp256k1^0.200.30.0out of date
 p256^0.11.10.13.2out of date

Dev dependencies

(6 total, 3 outdated)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 serde_test^1.01.0.177up to date
 serde_json^11.0.134up to date
 paste^1.0.21.0.15up to date
 proptest^0.101.6.0out of date
 proptest-derive^0.20.5.1out of date
 blake2^0.90.10.6out of date

Security Vulnerabilities

curve25519-dalek: Timing variability in `curve25519-dalek`'s `Scalar29::sub`/`Scalar52::sub`

RUSTSEC-2024-0344

Timing variability of any kind is problematic when working with potentially secret values such as elliptic curve scalars, and such issues can potentially leak private keys and other secrets. Such a problem was recently discovered in curve25519-dalek.

The Scalar29::sub (32-bit) and Scalar52::sub (64-bit) functions contained usage of a mask value inside a loop where LLVM saw an opportunity to insert a branch instruction (jns on x86) to conditionally bypass this code section when the mask value is set to zero as can be seen in godbolt:

A similar problem was recently discovered in the Kyber reference implementation:

https://groups.google.com/a/list.nist.gov/g/pqc-forum/c/hqbtIGFKIpU/m/cnE3pbueBgAJ

As discussed on that thread, one portable solution, which is also used in this PR, is to introduce a volatile read as an optimization barrier, which prevents the compiler from optimizing it away.

The fix can be validated in godbolt here:

The problem was discovered and the solution independently verified by Alexander Wagner [email protected] and Lea Themint [email protected] using their DATA tool:

https://github.com/Fraunhofer-AISEC/DATA