This project might be open to known security vulnerabilities, which can be prevented by tightening the version range of affected dependencies. Find detailed information at the bottom.

Crate tiberius

Dependencies

(32 total, 13 outdated, 4 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 async-io^1.82.6.0out of date
 async-native-tls^0.40.6.0out of date
 async-net^1.72.0.0out of date
 async-std^11.13.2up to date
 async-trait^0.10.1.89up to date
 asynchronous-codec^0.60.7.0out of date
 bigdecimal^0.30.4.10out of date
 byteorder^1.01.5.0up to date
 bytes ⚠️^1.01.11.1maybe insecure
 chrono ⚠️^0.40.4.44maybe insecure
 connection-string^0.20.2.0up to date
 encoding_rs^0.80.8.35up to date
 enumflags2^0.70.7.12up to date
 futures-lite^1.12.02.6.1out of date
 futures-util^0.30.3.32up to date
 libgssapi^0.4.50.9.1out of date
 num-traits^0.20.2.19up to date
 once_cell^1.31.21.4up to date
 opentls^0.2.10.2.1up to date
 pin-project-lite^0.20.2.17up to date
 pretty-hex^0.30.4.1out of date
 rust_decimal^1.61.40.0up to date
 rustls-native-certs^0.60.8.3out of date
 rustls-pemfile^12.2.0out of date
 thiserror^1.02.0.18out of date
 time ⚠️^0.30.3.47maybe insecure
 tokio ⚠️^1.01.50.0maybe insecure
 tokio-rustls^0.24.00.26.4out of date
 tokio-util^0.70.7.18up to date
 tracing^0.10.1.44up to date
 uuid^1.01.22.0up to date
 winauth^0.0.40.0.5out of date

Dev dependencies

(15 total, 6 outdated, 1 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 anyhow^11.0.102up to date
 async-std^11.13.2up to date
 azure_identity^0.5.00.33.0out of date
 chrono^0.4.380.4.44up to date
 env_logger^0.90.11.9out of date
 indicatif^0.170.18.4out of date
 indoc^1.0.72.0.7out of date
 names^0.140.14.0up to date
 oauth2^4.2.35.0.0out of date
 paste^1.01.0.15up to date
 reqwest^0.11.100.13.2out of date
 tokio ⚠️^1.01.50.0maybe insecure
 tokio-util^0.70.7.18up to date
 url^2.2.22.5.8up to date
 uuid^1.01.22.0up to date

Security Vulnerabilities

chrono: Potential segfault in `localtime_r` invocations

RUSTSEC-2020-0159

Impact

Unix-like operating systems may segfault due to dereferencing a dangling pointer in specific circumstances. This requires an environment variable to be set in a different thread than the affected functions. This may occur without the user's knowledge, notably in a third-party library.

Workarounds

No workarounds are known.

References

tokio: reject_remote_clients Configuration corruption

RUSTSEC-2023-0001

On Windows, configuring a named pipe server with pipe_mode will force ServerOptions::reject_remote_clients as false.

This drops any intended explicit configuration for the reject_remote_clients that may have been set as true previously.

The default setting of reject_remote_clients is normally true meaning the default is also overridden as false.

Workarounds

Ensure that pipe_mode is set first after initializing a ServerOptions. For example:

let mut opts = ServerOptions::new();
opts.pipe_mode(PipeMode::Message);
opts.reject_remote_clients(true);

bytes: Integer overflow in `BytesMut::reserve`

RUSTSEC-2026-0007

In the unique reclaim path of BytesMut::reserve, the condition

if v_capacity >= new_cap + offset

uses an unchecked addition. When new_cap + offset overflows usize in release builds, this condition may incorrectly pass, causing self.cap to be set to a value that exceeds the actual allocated capacity. Subsequent APIs such as spare_capacity_mut() then trust this corrupted cap value and may create out-of-bounds slices, leading to UB.

This behavior is observable in release builds (integer overflow wraps), whereas debug builds panic due to overflow checks.

PoC

use bytes::*;

fn main() {
    let mut a = BytesMut::from(&b"hello world"[..]);
    let mut b = a.split_off(5);

    // Ensure b becomes the unique owner of the backing storage
    drop(a);

    // Trigger overflow in new_cap + offset inside reserve
    b.reserve(usize::MAX - 6);

    // This call relies on the corrupted cap and may cause UB & HBO
    b.put_u8(b'h');
}

Workarounds

Users of BytesMut::reserve are only affected if integer overflow checks are configured to wrap. When integer overflow is configured to panic, this issue does not apply.

time: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion

RUSTSEC-2026-0009

Impact

When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary, non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.

Patches

A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned rather than exhausting the stack.

Workarounds

Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.