This project might be open to known security vulnerabilities, which can be prevented by tightening the version range of affected dependencies. Find detailed information at the bottom.

Crate scylla

Dependencies

(30 total, 14 outdated, 2 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 arc-swap^1.3.01.8.2up to date
 async-trait^0.1.560.1.89up to date
 base64^0.21.10.22.1out of date
 byteorder^1.3.41.5.0up to date
 bytes ⚠️^1.0.11.11.1maybe insecure
 chrono^0.4.200.4.44up to date
 dashmap^5.26.1.0out of date
 futures^0.3.60.3.32up to date
 histogram^0.6.90.11.5out of date
 itertools^0.11.00.14.0out of date
 lz4_flex^0.11.10.13.0out of date
 num_enum^0.60.7.6out of date
 openssl ⚠️^0.10.320.10.76maybe insecure
 rand^0.8.30.10.0out of date
 rand_pcg^0.3.10.10.1out of date
 scylla-cql^0.1.01.5.0out of date
 scylla-macros^0.4.01.5.0out of date
 serde^1.01.0.228up to date
 serde_yaml^0.9.140.9.34+deprecatedup to date
 smallvec^1.8.01.15.1up to date
 snap^1.01.1.1up to date
 socket2^0.5.30.6.3out of date
 strum^0.230.28.0out of date
 strum_macros^0.230.28.0out of date
 thiserror^1.02.0.18out of date
 tokio^1.271.50.0up to date
 tokio-openssl^0.6.10.6.5up to date
 tracing^0.1.360.1.44up to date
 url^2.3.12.5.8up to date
 uuid^1.01.22.0up to date

Dev dependencies

(10 total, 3 outdated, 2 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 assert_matches^1.5.01.5.0up to date
 bigdecimal^0.40.4.10up to date
 criterion^0.40.8.2out of date
 ntest^0.9.00.9.5up to date
 num-bigint^0.40.4.6up to date
 rand_chacha^0.3.10.10.0out of date
 scylla-proxy^0.0.30.0.5out of date
 time ⚠️^0.30.3.47maybe insecure
 tokio^1.271.50.0up to date
 tracing-subscriber ⚠️^0.3.140.3.23maybe insecure

Security Vulnerabilities

openssl: Use-After-Free in `Md::fetch` and `Cipher::fetch`

RUSTSEC-2025-0022

When a Some(...) value was passed to the properties argument of either of these functions, a use-after-free would result.

In practice this would nearly always result in OpenSSL treating the properties as an empty string (due to CString::drop's behavior).

The maintainers thank quitbug for reporting this vulnerability to us.

tracing-subscriber: Logging user input may result in poisoning logs with ANSI escape sequences

RUSTSEC-2025-0055

Previous versions of tracing-subscriber were vulnerable to ANSI escape sequence injection attacks. Untrusted user input containing ANSI escape sequences could be injected into terminal output when logged, potentially allowing attackers to:

  • Manipulate terminal title bars
  • Clear screens or modify terminal display
  • Potentially mislead users through terminal manipulation

In isolation, impact is minimal, however security issues have been found in terminal emulators that enabled an attacker to use ANSI escape sequences via logs to exploit vulnerabilities in the terminal emulator.

This was patched in PR #3368 to escape ANSI control characters from user input.

bytes: Integer overflow in `BytesMut::reserve`

RUSTSEC-2026-0007

In the unique reclaim path of BytesMut::reserve, the condition

if v_capacity >= new_cap + offset

uses an unchecked addition. When new_cap + offset overflows usize in release builds, this condition may incorrectly pass, causing self.cap to be set to a value that exceeds the actual allocated capacity. Subsequent APIs such as spare_capacity_mut() then trust this corrupted cap value and may create out-of-bounds slices, leading to UB.

This behavior is observable in release builds (integer overflow wraps), whereas debug builds panic due to overflow checks.

PoC

use bytes::*;

fn main() {
    let mut a = BytesMut::from(&b"hello world"[..]);
    let mut b = a.split_off(5);

    // Ensure b becomes the unique owner of the backing storage
    drop(a);

    // Trigger overflow in new_cap + offset inside reserve
    b.reserve(usize::MAX - 6);

    // This call relies on the corrupted cap and may cause UB & HBO
    b.put_u8(b'h');
}

Workarounds

Users of BytesMut::reserve are only affected if integer overflow checks are configured to wrap. When integer overflow is configured to panic, this issue does not apply.

time: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion

RUSTSEC-2026-0009

Impact

When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary, non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.

Patches

A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned rather than exhausting the stack.

Workarounds

Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.