This project contains known security vulnerabilities. Find detailed information at the bottom.

Crate oha

Dependencies

(23 total, 15 outdated, 1 insecure, 2 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 anyhow^11.0.82up to date
 average^0.10.40.15.0out of date
 base64^0.12.00.22.0out of date
 byte-unit^3.0.35.1.4out of date
 clap^24.5.4out of date
 crossbeam^0.70.8.4out of date
 crossterm^0.14.00.27.0out of date
 float-ord^0.2.00.3.2out of date
 flume^0.7.00.11.0out of date
 futures^0.30.3.30up to date
 futures-util^0.3.40.3.30up to date
 http^0.21.1.0out of date
 hyper ⚠️^0.13.41.3.1out of date
 libc^0.2.670.2.153up to date
 native-tls^0.2.40.2.11up to date
 parse_duration ⚠️^22.1.1insecure
 rand^0.70.8.5out of date
 rlimit^0.3.00.10.1out of date
 structopt^0.30.3.26up to date
 tokio ⚠️^0.21.37.0out of date
 tokio-tls^0.3.00.3.1up to date
 trust-dns-resolver^0.19.30.23.2out of date
 tui^0.8.00.19.0out of date

Dev dependencies

(6 total, 5 outdated, 1 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 assert_cmd^1.0.02.0.14out of date
 bytes^0.5.41.6.0out of date
 get-port^1.3.14.0.0out of date
 http^0.21.1.0out of date
 lazy_static^1.4.01.4.0up to date
 warp ⚠️^0.20.3.7out of date

Security Vulnerabilities

parse_duration: Denial of service through parsing payloads with too big exponent

RUSTSEC-2021-0041

The parse_duration::parse function allows for parsing duration strings with exponents like 5e5s where under the hood, the BigInt type along with the pow function are used for such payloads. Passing an arbitrarily big exponent makes the parse_duration::parse function to process the payload for a very long time taking up CPU and memory.

This allows an attacker to cause a DoS if the parse_duration::parse function is used to process untrusted input.

hyper: Lenient `hyper` header parsing of `Content-Length` could allow request smuggling

RUSTSEC-2021-0078

hyper's HTTP header parser accepted, according to RFC 7230, illegal contents inside Content-Length headers. Due to this, upstream HTTP proxies that ignore the header may still forward them along if it chooses to ignore the error.

To be vulnerable, hyper must be used as an HTTP/1 server and using an HTTP proxy upstream that ignores the header's contents but still forwards it. Due to all the factors that must line up, an attack exploiting this vulnerability is unlikely.

hyper: Integer overflow in `hyper`'s parsing of the `Transfer-Encoding` header leads to data loss

RUSTSEC-2021-0079

When decoding chunk sizes that are too large, hyper's code would encounter an integer overflow. Depending on the situation, this could lead to data loss from an incorrect total size, or in rarer cases, a request smuggling attack.

To be vulnerable, you must be using hyper for any HTTP/1 purpose, including as a client or server, and consumers must send requests or responses that specify a chunk size greater than 18 exabytes. For a possible request smuggling attack to be possible, any upstream proxies must accept a chunk size greater than 64 bits.

tokio: Data race when sending and receiving after closing a `oneshot` channel

RUSTSEC-2021-0124

If a tokio::sync::oneshot channel is closed (via the oneshot::Receiver::close method), a data race may occur if the oneshot::Sender::send method is called while the corresponding oneshot::Receiver is awaited or calling try_recv.

When these methods are called concurrently on a closed channel, the two halves of the channel can concurrently access a shared memory location, resulting in a data race. This has been observed to cause memory corruption.

Note that the race only occurs when both halves of the channel are used after the Receiver half has called close. Code where close is not used, or where the Receiver is not awaited and try_recv is not called after calling close, is not affected.

See tokio#4225 for more details.

warp: Improper validation of Windows paths could lead to directory traversal attack

RUSTSEC-2022-0082

Path resolution in warp::filters::fs::dir didn't correctly validate Windows paths meaning paths like /foo/bar/c:/windows/web/screen/img101.png would be allowed and respond with the contents of c:/windows/web/screen/img101.png. Thus users could potentially read files anywhere on the filesystem.

This only impacts Windows. Linux and other unix likes are not impacted by this.