This project might be open to known security vulnerabilities, which can be prevented by tightening the version range of affected dependencies. Find detailed information at the bottom.

Crate actix-http

Dependencies

(32 total, 5 outdated, 1 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 actix-codec^0.50.5.2up to date
 actix-rt^2.22.10.0up to date
 actix-service^22.0.3up to date
 actix-tls^3.43.4.0up to date
 actix-utils^33.0.1up to date
 ahash^0.80.8.11up to date
 base64^0.220.22.1up to date
 bitflags^22.9.0up to date
 brotli^67.0.0out of date
 bytes^11.10.1up to date
 bytestring^11.4.0up to date
 derive_more^0.99.52.0.1out of date
 encoding_rs^0.80.8.35up to date
 flate2^1.0.131.1.0up to date
 futures-core^0.3.170.3.31up to date
 h2 ⚠️^0.3.240.4.8out of date
 http^0.2.71.3.1out of date
 httparse^1.5.11.10.1up to date
 httpdate^1.0.11.0.3up to date
 itoa^11.0.15up to date
 language-tags^0.30.3.2up to date
 local-channel^0.10.1.5up to date
 mime^0.3.40.3.17up to date
 percent-encoding^2.12.3.1up to date
 pin-project-lite^0.20.2.16up to date
 rand^0.80.9.0out of date
 sha1^0.100.10.6up to date
 smallvec^1.6.11.14.0up to date
 tokio^1.24.21.44.1up to date
 tokio-util^0.70.7.14up to date
 tracing^0.1.300.1.41up to date
 zstd^0.130.13.3up to date

Dev dependencies

(21 total, 3 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 actix-http-test^33.2.0up to date
 actix-server^22.5.1up to date
 actix-tls^3.43.4.0up to date
 actix-web^44.10.2up to date
 async-stream^0.30.3.6up to date
 criterion^0.50.5.1up to date
 divan^0.1.80.1.17up to date
 env_logger^0.110.11.7up to date
 futures-util^0.3.170.3.31up to date
 memchr^2.42.7.4up to date
 once_cell^1.91.21.1up to date
 rcgen^0.130.13.2up to date
 regex ⚠️^1.31.11.1maybe insecure
 rustls-pemfile^22.2.0up to date
 rustversion^11.0.20up to date
 serde^1.01.0.219up to date
 serde_json^1.01.0.140up to date
 static_assertions^11.1.0up to date
 openssl ⚠️^0.10.550.10.71maybe insecure
 rustls ⚠️^0.230.23.25maybe insecure
 tokio^1.24.21.44.1up to date

Security Vulnerabilities

regex: Regexes with large repetitions on empty sub-expressions take a very long time to parse

RUSTSEC-2022-0013

The Rust Security Response WG was notified that the regex crate did not properly limit the complexity of the regular expressions (regex) it parses. An attacker could use this security issue to perform a denial of service, by sending a specially crafted regex to a service accepting untrusted regexes. No known vulnerability is present when parsing untrusted input with trusted regexes.

This issue has been assigned CVE-2022-24713. The severity of this vulnerability is "high" when the regex crate is used to parse untrusted regexes. Other uses of the regex crate are not affected by this vulnerability.

Overview

The regex crate features built-in mitigations to prevent denial of service attacks caused by untrusted regexes, or untrusted input matched by trusted regexes. Those (tunable) mitigations already provide sane defaults to prevent attacks. This guarantee is documented and it's considered part of the crate's API.

Unfortunately a bug was discovered in the mitigations designed to prevent untrusted regexes to take an arbitrary amount of time during parsing, and it's possible to craft regexes that bypass such mitigations. This makes it possible to perform denial of service attacks by sending specially crafted regexes to services accepting user-controlled, untrusted regexes.

Affected versions

All versions of the regex crate before or equal to 1.5.4 are affected by this issue. The fix is include starting from regex 1.5.5.

Mitigations

We recommend everyone accepting user-controlled regexes to upgrade immediately to the latest version of the regex crate.

Unfortunately there is no fixed set of problematic regexes, as there are practically infinite regexes that could be crafted to exploit this vulnerability. Because of this, we do not recommend denying known problematic regexes.

Acknowledgements

We want to thank Addison Crump for responsibly disclosing this to us according to the Rust security policy, and for helping review the fix.

We also want to thank Andrew Gallant for developing the fix, and Pietro Albini for coordinating the disclosure and writing this advisory.

h2: Degradation of service in h2 servers with CONTINUATION Flood

RUSTSEC-2024-0332

An attacker can send a flood of CONTINUATION frames, causing h2 to process them indefinitely. This results in an increase in CPU usage.

Tokio task budget helps prevent this from a complete denial-of-service, as the server can still respond to legitimate requests, albeit with increased latency.

More details at "https://seanmonstar.com/blog/hyper-http2-continuation-flood/.

Patches available for 0.4.x and 0.3.x versions.

rustls: rustls network-reachable panic in `Acceptor::accept`

RUSTSEC-2024-0399

A bug introduced in rustls 0.23.13 leads to a panic if the received TLS ClientHello is fragmented. Only servers that use rustls::server::Acceptor::accept() are affected.

Servers that use tokio-rustls's LazyConfigAcceptor API are affected.

Servers that use tokio-rustls's TlsAcceptor API are not affected.

Servers that use rustls-ffi's rustls_acceptor_accept API are affected.

openssl: ssl::select_next_proto use after free

RUSTSEC-2025-0004

In openssl versions before 0.10.70, ssl::select_next_proto can return a slice pointing into the server argument's buffer but with a lifetime bound to the client argument. In situations where the server buffer's lifetime is shorter than the client buffer's, this can cause a use after free. This could cause the server to crash or to return arbitrary memory contents to the client.

openssl 0.10.70 fixes the signature of ssl::select_next_proto to properly constrain the output buffer's lifetime to that of both input buffers.

In standard usage of ssl::select_next_proto in the callback passed to SslContextBuilder::set_alpn_select_callback, code is only affected if the server buffer is constructed within the callback. For example:

Not vulnerable - the server buffer has a 'static lifetime:

builder.set_alpn_select_callback(|_, client_protos| {
    ssl::select_next_proto(b"\x02h2", client_protos).ok_or_else(AlpnError::NOACK)
});

Not vulnerable - the server buffer outlives the handshake:

let server_protos = b"\x02h2".to_vec();
builder.set_alpn_select_callback(|_, client_protos| {
    ssl::select_next_proto(&server_protos, client_protos).ok_or_else(AlpnError::NOACK)
});

Vulnerable - the server buffer is freed when the callback returns:

builder.set_alpn_select_callback(|_, client_protos| {
    let server_protos = b"\x02h2".to_vec();
    ssl::select_next_proto(&server_protos, client_protos).ok_or_else(AlpnError::NOACK)
});