This project might be open to known security vulnerabilities, which can be prevented by tightening the version range of affected dependencies. Find detailed information at the bottom.

Crate rust-service-template

Dependencies

(22 total, 4 outdated, 2 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 color-eyre^0.60.6.3up to date
 console-subscriber^0.10.4.0out of date
 criterion^0.30.5.1out of date
 eyre ⚠️^0.60.6.12maybe insecure
 futures^0.30.3.31up to date
 hyper^0.14.171.5.0out of date
 itertools^0.100.13.0out of date
 mimalloc^0.10.1.43up to date
 once_cell^1.81.20.2up to date
 prometheus^0.130.13.4up to date
 proptest^1.01.5.0up to date
 serde^1.01.0.210up to date
 serde_json^1.01.0.128up to date
 smallvec^1.6.11.13.2up to date
 structopt^0.30.3.26up to date
 thiserror^1.01.0.64up to date
 tokio ⚠️^1.171.40.0maybe insecure
 tracing^0.10.1.40up to date
 tracing-futures^0.20.2.5up to date
 tracing-subscriber^0.30.3.18up to date
 url^2.22.5.2up to date
 users^0.110.11.0up to date

Dev dependencies

(3 total, all up-to-date)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 pretty_assertions^1.01.4.1up to date
 proptest^1.01.5.0up to date
 tracing-test^0.20.2.5up to date

Build dependencies

(2 total, 1 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 eyre ⚠️^0.60.6.12maybe insecure
 time^0.3.50.3.36up to date

Security Vulnerabilities

tokio: reject_remote_clients Configuration corruption

RUSTSEC-2023-0001

On Windows, configuring a named pipe server with pipe_mode will force ServerOptions::reject_remote_clients as false.

This drops any intended explicit configuration for the reject_remote_clients that may have been set as true previously.

The default setting of reject_remote_clients is normally true meaning the default is also overridden as false.

Workarounds

Ensure that pipe_mode is set first after initializing a ServerOptions. For example:

let mut opts = ServerOptions::new();
opts.pipe_mode(PipeMode::Message);
opts.reject_remote_clients(true);

eyre: Parts of Report are dropped as the wrong type during downcast

RUSTSEC-2024-0021

In affected versions, after a Report is constructed using wrap_err or wrap_err_with to attach a message of type D onto an error of type E, then using downcast to recover ownership of either the value of type D or the value of type E, one of two things can go wrong:

  • If downcasting to E, there remains a value of type D to be dropped. It is incorrectly "dropped" by running E's drop behavior, rather than D's. For example if D is &str and E is std::io::Error, there would be a call of std::io::Error::drop in which the reference received by the Drop impl does not refer to a valid value of type std::io::Error, but instead to &str.

  • If downcasting to D, there remains a value of type E to be dropped. When D and E do not happen to be the same size, E's drop behavior is incorrectly executed in the wrong location. The reference received by the Drop impl may point left or right of the real E value that is meant to be getting dropped.

In both cases, when the Report contains an error E that has nontrivial drop behavior, the most likely outcome is memory corruption.

When the Report contains an error E that has trivial drop behavior (for example a Utf8Error) but where D has nontrivial drop behavior (such as String), the most likely outcome is that downcasting to E would leak D.