This project contains known security vulnerabilities. Find detailed information at the bottom.

Crate barium-client

Dependencies

(24 total, 12 outdated, 1 insecure, 3 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 base-62^0.10.1.1up to date
 rand^0.70.9.0out of date
 rsa ⚠️^0.30.9.7insecure
 serde^1.01.0.219up to date
 serde_json^1.01.0.140up to date
 dirs^2.06.0.0out of date
 gtk^0.80.18.2out of date
 gtk_resources^0.1.5N/Aup to date
 gdk^0.120.18.2out of date
 gio^0.80.20.9out of date
 glib^0.90.20.9out of date
 pango^0.80.20.9out of date
 padlock^0.20.2.0up to date
 rmp-serde^0.141.3.0out of date
 native-tls^0.20.2.14up to date
 openssl ⚠️^0.100.10.71maybe insecure
 tray-item^0.4.0-alpha0.10.0out of date
 lazy_static^1.41.5.0up to date
 trust-dns-client^0.190.23.2out of date
 chrono ⚠️^0.40.4.40maybe insecure
 log^0.40.4.26up to date
 fern^0.60.7.1out of date
 clipboard^0.5.00.5.0up to date
 regex ⚠️^11.11.1maybe insecure

Build dependencies

(2 total, 1 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 regex ⚠️^1.31.11.1maybe insecure
 last-git-commit^0.20.2.0up to date

Crate barium-server

Dependencies

(16 total, 4 outdated, 1 insecure, 2 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 serde^1.01.0.219up to date
 serde_json^1.01.0.140up to date
 tokio ⚠️^0.21.44.0out of date
 padlock^0.20.2.0up to date
 rmp-serde^0.141.3.0out of date
 log^0.40.4.26up to date
 fern^0.60.7.1out of date
 chrono ⚠️^0.40.4.40maybe insecure
 rsa ⚠️^0.30.9.7insecure
 lazy_static^1.41.5.0up to date
 native-tls^0.20.2.14up to date
 ipnet^2.32.11.0up to date
 either^1.51.15.0up to date
 iron^0.60.6.1up to date
 router^0.60.6.0up to date
 base-62^0.10.1.1up to date

Build dependencies

(1 total, all up-to-date)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 last-git-commit^0.20.2.0up to date

Crate barium-shared

Dependencies

(3 total, 2 outdated, 1 insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 serde^1.01.0.219up to date
 rsa ⚠️^0.30.9.7insecure
 sha3^0.90.10.8out of date

Security Vulnerabilities

chrono: Potential segfault in `localtime_r` invocations

RUSTSEC-2020-0159

Impact

Unix-like operating systems may segfault due to dereferencing a dangling pointer in specific circumstances. This requires an environment variable to be set in a different thread than the affected functions. This may occur without the user's knowledge, notably in a third-party library.

Workarounds

No workarounds are known.

References

tokio: Data race when sending and receiving after closing a `oneshot` channel

RUSTSEC-2021-0124

If a tokio::sync::oneshot channel is closed (via the oneshot::Receiver::close method), a data race may occur if the oneshot::Sender::send method is called while the corresponding oneshot::Receiver is awaited or calling try_recv.

When these methods are called concurrently on a closed channel, the two halves of the channel can concurrently access a shared memory location, resulting in a data race. This has been observed to cause memory corruption.

Note that the race only occurs when both halves of the channel are used after the Receiver half has called close. Code where close is not used, or where the Receiver is not awaited and try_recv is not called after calling close, is not affected.

See tokio#4225 for more details.

regex: Regexes with large repetitions on empty sub-expressions take a very long time to parse

RUSTSEC-2022-0013

The Rust Security Response WG was notified that the regex crate did not properly limit the complexity of the regular expressions (regex) it parses. An attacker could use this security issue to perform a denial of service, by sending a specially crafted regex to a service accepting untrusted regexes. No known vulnerability is present when parsing untrusted input with trusted regexes.

This issue has been assigned CVE-2022-24713. The severity of this vulnerability is "high" when the regex crate is used to parse untrusted regexes. Other uses of the regex crate are not affected by this vulnerability.

Overview

The regex crate features built-in mitigations to prevent denial of service attacks caused by untrusted regexes, or untrusted input matched by trusted regexes. Those (tunable) mitigations already provide sane defaults to prevent attacks. This guarantee is documented and it's considered part of the crate's API.

Unfortunately a bug was discovered in the mitigations designed to prevent untrusted regexes to take an arbitrary amount of time during parsing, and it's possible to craft regexes that bypass such mitigations. This makes it possible to perform denial of service attacks by sending specially crafted regexes to services accepting user-controlled, untrusted regexes.

Affected versions

All versions of the regex crate before or equal to 1.5.4 are affected by this issue. The fix is include starting from regex 1.5.5.

Mitigations

We recommend everyone accepting user-controlled regexes to upgrade immediately to the latest version of the regex crate.

Unfortunately there is no fixed set of problematic regexes, as there are practically infinite regexes that could be crafted to exploit this vulnerability. Because of this, we do not recommend denying known problematic regexes.

Acknowledgements

We want to thank Addison Crump for responsibly disclosing this to us according to the Rust security policy, and for helping review the fix.

We also want to thank Andrew Gallant for developing the fix, and Pietro Albini for coordinating the disclosure and writing this advisory.

rsa: Marvin Attack: potential key recovery through timing sidechannels

RUSTSEC-2023-0071

Impact

Due to a non-constant-time implementation, information about the private key is leaked through timing information which is observable over the network. An attacker may be able to use that information to recover the key.

Patches

No patch is yet available, however work is underway to migrate to a fully constant-time implementation.

Workarounds

The only currently available workaround is to avoid using the rsa crate in settings where attackers are able to observe timing information, e.g. local use on a non-compromised computer is fine.

References

This vulnerability was discovered as part of the "Marvin Attack", which revealed several implementations of RSA including OpenSSL had not properly mitigated timing sidechannel attacks.

openssl: ssl::select_next_proto use after free

RUSTSEC-2025-0004

In openssl versions before 0.10.70, ssl::select_next_proto can return a slice pointing into the server argument's buffer but with a lifetime bound to the client argument. In situations where the server buffer's lifetime is shorter than the client buffer's, this can cause a use after free. This could cause the server to crash or to return arbitrary memory contents to the client.

openssl 0.10.70 fixes the signature of ssl::select_next_proto to properly constrain the output buffer's lifetime to that of both input buffers.

In standard usage of ssl::select_next_proto in the callback passed to SslContextBuilder::set_alpn_select_callback, code is only affected if the server buffer is constructed within the callback. For example:

Not vulnerable - the server buffer has a 'static lifetime:

builder.set_alpn_select_callback(|_, client_protos| {
    ssl::select_next_proto(b"\x02h2", client_protos).ok_or_else(AlpnError::NOACK)
});

Not vulnerable - the server buffer outlives the handshake:

let server_protos = b"\x02h2".to_vec();
builder.set_alpn_select_callback(|_, client_protos| {
    ssl::select_next_proto(&server_protos, client_protos).ok_or_else(AlpnError::NOACK)
});

Vulnerable - the server buffer is freed when the callback returns:

builder.set_alpn_select_callback(|_, client_protos| {
    let server_protos = b"\x02h2".to_vec();
    ssl::select_next_proto(&server_protos, client_protos).ok_or_else(AlpnError::NOACK)
});