This project contains known security vulnerabilities. Find detailed information at the bottom.

Crate sccache

Dependencies

(54 total, 34 outdated, 1 insecure, 5 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 atty^0.2.60.2.14up to date
 base64^0.9.00.22.0out of date
 bincode^0.91.3.3out of date
 byteorder^1.01.5.0up to date
 chrono ⚠️^0.30.4.38out of date
 clap^2.23.04.5.4out of date
 daemonize^0.2.30.5.0out of date
 directories^0.8.45.0.1out of date
 env_logger^0.40.11.3out of date
 error-chain^0.110.12.4out of date
 filetime^0.10.2.23out of date
 futures^0.1.110.3.30out of date
 futures-cpupool^0.10.1.8up to date
 hyper ⚠️^0.111.3.1out of date
 hyper-tls^0.10.6.0out of date
 jobserver^0.10.1.30up to date
 jsonwebtoken^4.09.3.0out of date
 kernel32-sys^0.2.20.2.2up to date
 lazy_static^1.0.01.4.0up to date
 libc^0.2.100.2.153up to date
 local-encoding^0.2.00.2.0up to date
 log^0.3.60.4.21out of date
 lru-disk-cache^0.2.0N/Aup to date
 memcached-rs^0.10.4.2out of date
 mio-named-pipes^0.10.1.7up to date
 native-tls^0.10.2.11out of date
 num_cpus^1.01.16.0up to date
 number_prefix^0.2.50.4.0out of date
 openssl ⚠️^0.90.10.64out of date
 redis^0.8.00.25.3out of date
 regex ⚠️^0.21.10.4out of date
 retry^0.4.02.0.0out of date
 ring^0.12.10.17.8out of date
 rust-crypto ⚠️^0.2.360.2.36insecure
 serde^1.01.0.198up to date
 serde_derive^1.01.0.198up to date
 serde_json^1.01.0.116up to date
 strip-ansi-escapes^0.10.2.0out of date
 tempdir^0.3.40.3.7up to date
 tempfile^2.1.53.10.1out of date
 time ⚠️^0.1.350.3.36out of date
 tokio-core^0.1.60.1.18up to date
 tokio-io^0.10.1.13up to date
 tokio-process^0.10.2.5out of date
 tokio-proto^0.10.1.1up to date
 tokio-serde-bincode^0.10.2.1out of date
 tokio-service^0.10.1.0up to date
 tokio-tls^0.10.3.1out of date
 tokio-uds^0.10.2.7out of date
 url^1.02.5.0out of date
 uuid^0.61.8.0out of date
 which^1.06.0.1out of date
 winapi^0.20.3.9out of date
 zip=0.2.30.6.6out of date

Dev dependencies

(3 total, 2 outdated)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 assert_cli^0.50.6.3out of date
 cc^1.01.0.94up to date
 itertools^0.70.12.1out of date

Security Vulnerabilities

hyper: Flaw in hyper allows request smuggling by sending a body in GET requests

RUSTSEC-2020-0008

Vulnerable versions of hyper allow GET requests to have bodies, even if there is no Transfer-Encoding or Content-Length header. As per the HTTP 1.1 specification, such requests do not have bodies, so the body will be interpreted as a separate HTTP request.

This allows an attacker who can control the body and method of an HTTP request made by hyper to inject a request with headers that would not otherwise be allowed, as demonstrated by sending a malformed HTTP request from a Substrate runtime. This allows bypassing CORS restrictions. In combination with other vulnerabilities, such as an exploitable web server listening on loopback, it may allow remote code execution.

The flaw was corrected in hyper version 0.12.34.

time: Potential segfault in the time crate

RUSTSEC-2020-0071

Impact

Unix-like operating systems may segfault due to dereferencing a dangling pointer in specific circumstances. This requires an environment variable to be set in a different thread than the affected functions. This may occur without the user's knowledge, notably in a third-party library.

The affected functions from time 0.2.7 through 0.2.22 are:

  • time::UtcOffset::local_offset_at
  • time::UtcOffset::try_local_offset_at
  • time::UtcOffset::current_local_offset
  • time::UtcOffset::try_current_local_offset
  • time::OffsetDateTime::now_local
  • time::OffsetDateTime::try_now_local

The affected functions in time 0.1 (all versions) are:

  • at
  • at_utc
  • now

Non-Unix targets (including Windows and wasm) are unaffected.

Patches

Pending a proper fix, the internal method that determines the local offset has been modified to always return None on the affected operating systems. This has the effect of returning an Err on the try_* methods and UTC on the non-try_* methods.

Users and library authors with time in their dependency tree should perform cargo update, which will pull in the updated, unaffected code.

Users of time 0.1 do not have a patch and should upgrade to an unaffected version: time 0.2.23 or greater or the 0.3 series.

Workarounds

A possible workaround for crates affected through the transitive dependency in chrono, is to avoid using the default oldtime feature dependency of the chrono crate by disabling its default-features and manually specifying the required features instead.

Examples:

Cargo.toml:

chrono = { version = "0.4", default-features = false, features = ["serde"] }
chrono = { version = "0.4.22", default-features = false, features = ["clock"] }

Commandline:

cargo add chrono --no-default-features -F clock

Sources:

chrono: Potential segfault in `localtime_r` invocations

RUSTSEC-2020-0159

Impact

Unix-like operating systems may segfault due to dereferencing a dangling pointer in specific circumstances. This requires an environment variable to be set in a different thread than the affected functions. This may occur without the user's knowledge, notably in a third-party library.

Workarounds

No workarounds are known.

References

hyper: Lenient `hyper` header parsing of `Content-Length` could allow request smuggling

RUSTSEC-2021-0078

hyper's HTTP header parser accepted, according to RFC 7230, illegal contents inside Content-Length headers. Due to this, upstream HTTP proxies that ignore the header may still forward them along if it chooses to ignore the error.

To be vulnerable, hyper must be used as an HTTP/1 server and using an HTTP proxy upstream that ignores the header's contents but still forwards it. Due to all the factors that must line up, an attack exploiting this vulnerability is unlikely.

hyper: Integer overflow in `hyper`'s parsing of the `Transfer-Encoding` header leads to data loss

RUSTSEC-2021-0079

When decoding chunk sizes that are too large, hyper's code would encounter an integer overflow. Depending on the situation, this could lead to data loss from an incorrect total size, or in rarer cases, a request smuggling attack.

To be vulnerable, you must be using hyper for any HTTP/1 purpose, including as a client or server, and consumers must send requests or responses that specify a chunk size greater than 18 exabytes. For a possible request smuggling attack to be possible, any upstream proxies must accept a chunk size greater than 64 bits.

rust-crypto: Miscomputation when performing AES encryption in rust-crypto

RUSTSEC-2022-0011

The following Rust program demonstrates some strangeness in AES encryption - if you have an immutable key slice and then operate on that slice, you get different encryption output than if you operate on a copy of that key.

For these functions, we expect that extending a 16 byte key to a 32 byte key by repeating it gives the same encrypted data, because the underlying rust-crypto functions repeat key data up to the necessary key size for the cipher.

use crypto::{
    aes, blockmodes, buffer,
    buffer::{BufferResult, ReadBuffer, WriteBuffer},
    symmetriccipher,
};

fn encrypt(
    key: &[u8],
    iv: &[u8],
    data: &str,
) -> Result<String, symmetriccipher::SymmetricCipherError> {
    let mut encryptor =
        aes::cbc_encryptor(aes::KeySize::KeySize256, key, iv, blockmodes::PkcsPadding);

    let mut encrypted_data = Vec::<u8>::new();
    let mut read_buffer = buffer::RefReadBuffer::new(data.as_bytes());
    let mut buffer = [0; 4096];
    let mut write_buffer = buffer::RefWriteBuffer::new(&mut buffer);

    loop {
        let result = encryptor.encrypt(&mut read_buffer, &mut write_buffer, true)?;

        encrypted_data.extend(
            write_buffer
                .take_read_buffer()
                .take_remaining()
                .iter()
                .copied(),
        );

        match result {
            BufferResult::BufferUnderflow => break,
            BufferResult::BufferOverflow => {}
        }
    }

    Ok(hex::encode(encrypted_data))
}

fn working() {
    let data = "data";
    let iv = [
        0xF0, 0xF1, 0xF2, 0xF3, 0xF4, 0xF5, 0xF6, 0xF7, 0xF8, 0xF9, 0xFA, 0xFB, 0xFC, 0xFD, 0xFE,
        0xFF,
    ];
    let key = [
        0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0B, 0x0C, 0x0D, 0x0E,
        0x0F,
    ];
    // The copy here makes the code work.
    let key_copy = key;
    let key2: Vec<u8> = key_copy.iter().cycle().take(32).copied().collect();
    println!("key1:{} key2: {}", hex::encode(&key), hex::encode(&key2));

    let x1 = encrypt(&key, &iv, data).unwrap();
    println!("X1: {}", x1);

    let x2 = encrypt(&key2, &iv, data).unwrap();
    println!("X2: {}", x2);

    assert_eq!(x1, x2);
}

fn broken() {
    let data = "data";
    let iv = [
        0xF0, 0xF1, 0xF2, 0xF3, 0xF4, 0xF5, 0xF6, 0xF7, 0xF8, 0xF9, 0xFA, 0xFB, 0xFC, 0xFD, 0xFE,
        0xFF,
    ];
    let key = [
        0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0B, 0x0C, 0x0D, 0x0E,
        0x0F,
    ];
    // This operation shouldn't affect the contents of key at all.
    let key2: Vec<u8> = key.iter().cycle().take(32).copied().collect();
    println!("key1:{} key2: {}", hex::encode(&key), hex::encode(&key2));

    let x1 = encrypt(&key, &iv, data).unwrap();
    println!("X1: {}", x1);

    let x2 = encrypt(&key2, &iv, data).unwrap();
    println!("X2: {}", x2);

    assert_eq!(x1, x2);
}

fn main() {
    working();
    broken();
}

The output from this program:

     Running `target/host/debug/rust-crypto-test`
key1:000102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f key2: 000102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f000102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f
X1: 90462bbe32965c8e7ea0addbbed4cddb
X2: 90462bbe32965c8e7ea0addbbed4cddb
key1:000102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f key2: 000102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f000102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f
X1: 26e847e5e7df1947bf82a650548a7d5b
X2: 90462bbe32965c8e7ea0addbbed4cddb
thread 'main' panicked at 'assertion failed: `(left == right)`
  left: `"26e847e5e7df1947bf82a650548a7d5b"`,
 right: `"90462bbe32965c8e7ea0addbbed4cddb"`', src/main.rs:83:5

Notably, the X1 key in the broken() test changes every time after rerunning the program.

regex: Regexes with large repetitions on empty sub-expressions take a very long time to parse

RUSTSEC-2022-0013

The Rust Security Response WG was notified that the regex crate did not properly limit the complexity of the regular expressions (regex) it parses. An attacker could use this security issue to perform a denial of service, by sending a specially crafted regex to a service accepting untrusted regexes. No known vulnerability is present when parsing untrusted input with trusted regexes.

This issue has been assigned CVE-2022-24713. The severity of this vulnerability is "high" when the regex crate is used to parse untrusted regexes. Other uses of the regex crate are not affected by this vulnerability.

Overview

The regex crate features built-in mitigations to prevent denial of service attacks caused by untrusted regexes, or untrusted input matched by trusted regexes. Those (tunable) mitigations already provide sane defaults to prevent attacks. This guarantee is documented and it's considered part of the crate's API.

Unfortunately a bug was discovered in the mitigations designed to prevent untrusted regexes to take an arbitrary amount of time during parsing, and it's possible to craft regexes that bypass such mitigations. This makes it possible to perform denial of service attacks by sending specially crafted regexes to services accepting user-controlled, untrusted regexes.

Affected versions

All versions of the regex crate before or equal to 1.5.4 are affected by this issue. The fix is include starting from regex 1.5.5.

Mitigations

We recommend everyone accepting user-controlled regexes to upgrade immediately to the latest version of the regex crate.

Unfortunately there is no fixed set of problematic regexes, as there are practically infinite regexes that could be crafted to exploit this vulnerability. Because of this, we do not recommend denying known problematic regexes.

Acknowledgements

We want to thank Addison Crump for responsibly disclosing this to us according to the Rust security policy, and for helping review the fix.

We also want to thank Andrew Gallant for developing the fix, and Pietro Albini for coordinating the disclosure and writing this advisory.

openssl: `openssl` `X509NameBuilder::build` returned object is not thread safe

RUSTSEC-2023-0022

OpenSSL has a modified bit that it can set on on X509_NAME objects. If this bit is set then the object is not thread-safe even when it appears the code is not modifying the value.

Thanks to David Benjamin (Google) for reporting this issue.

openssl: `openssl` `SubjectAlternativeName` and `ExtendedKeyUsage::other` allow arbitrary file read

RUSTSEC-2023-0023

SubjectAlternativeName and ExtendedKeyUsage arguments were parsed using the OpenSSL function X509V3_EXT_nconf. This function parses all input using an OpenSSL mini-language which can perform arbitrary file reads.

Thanks to David Benjamin (Google) for reporting this issue.

openssl: `openssl` `X509Extension::new` and `X509Extension::new_nid` null pointer dereference

RUSTSEC-2023-0024

These functions would crash when the context argument was None with certain extension types.

Thanks to David Benjamin (Google) for reporting this issue.

openssl: `openssl` `X509VerifyParamRef::set_host` buffer over-read

RUSTSEC-2023-0044

When this function was passed an empty string, openssl would attempt to call strlen on it, reading arbitrary memory until it reached a NUL byte.