This project might be open to known security vulnerabilities, which can be prevented by tightening the version range of affected dependencies. Find detailed information at the bottom.

Crate russh

Dependencies

(36 total, 7 outdated, 3 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 aes^0.80.8.4up to date
 aes-gcm ⚠️^0.100.10.3maybe insecure
 async-trait^0.10.1.89up to date
 bitflags^2.02.10.0up to date
 byteorder^1.41.5.0up to date
 cbc^0.10.1.2up to date
 chacha20^0.90.9.1up to date
 ctr^0.90.9.2up to date
 curve25519-dalek^4.1.34.1.3up to date
 des^0.8.10.8.1up to date
 digest^0.100.10.7up to date
 elliptic-curve^0.130.13.8up to date
 flate2^1.01.1.5up to date
 futures^0.30.3.31up to date
 generic-array^0.141.3.5out of date
 hex-literal^0.41.1.0out of date
 hmac^0.120.12.1up to date
 log^0.40.4.29up to date
 num-bigint^0.40.4.6up to date
 once_cell^1.131.21.3up to date
 openssl ⚠️^0.100.10.75maybe insecure
 p256^0.130.13.2up to date
 p384^0.130.13.1up to date
 p521^0.130.13.3up to date
 poly1305^0.80.8.0up to date
 rand^0.80.9.2out of date
 rand_core^0.6.40.9.3out of date
 russh-cryptovec^0.7.00.52.0out of date
 russh-keys^0.45.00.49.2out of date
 sha1^0.100.10.6up to date
 sha2^0.100.10.9up to date
 ssh-encoding^0.20.2.0up to date
 ssh-key^0.60.6.7up to date
 subtle^2.42.6.1up to date
 thiserror^1.02.0.17out of date
 tokio ⚠️^1.17.01.49.0maybe insecure

Dev dependencies

(10 total, 5 outdated, 1 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 anyhow^1.01.0.100up to date
 clap^3.24.5.54out of date
 env_logger^0.100.11.8out of date
 rand^0.8.50.9.2out of date
 ratatui^0.26.00.30.0out of date
 russh-sftp^2.0.0-beta.22.1.1up to date
 shell-escape^0.10.1.5up to date
 termion^24.0.6out of date
 tokio ⚠️^1.17.01.49.0maybe insecure
 tokio-fd^0.30.3.0up to date

Security Vulnerabilities

tokio: reject_remote_clients Configuration corruption

RUSTSEC-2023-0001

On Windows, configuring a named pipe server with pipe_mode will force ServerOptions::reject_remote_clients as false.

This drops any intended explicit configuration for the reject_remote_clients that may have been set as true previously.

The default setting of reject_remote_clients is normally true meaning the default is also overridden as false.

Workarounds

Ensure that pipe_mode is set first after initializing a ServerOptions. For example:

let mut opts = ServerOptions::new();
opts.pipe_mode(PipeMode::Message);
opts.reject_remote_clients(true);

aes-gcm: Plaintext exposed in decrypt_in_place_detached even on tag verification failure

RUSTSEC-2023-0096

Summary

In the AES GCM implementation of decrypt_in_place_detached, the decrypted ciphertext (i.e. the correct plaintext) is exposed even if tag verification fails.

Impact

If a program using the aes-gcm crate's decrypt_in_place* APIs accesses the buffer after decryption failure, it will contain a decryption of an unauthenticated input. Depending on the specific nature of the program this may enable Chosen Ciphertext Attacks (CCAs) which can cause a catastrophic breakage of the cipher including full plaintext recovery.

Details

As seen in the implementation of decrypt_in_place_detached for AES GCM, if the tag verification fails, an error is returned. Because the decryption of the ciphertext is done in place, the plaintext contents are now exposed via buffer.

This should ideally not be the case - as noted in page 17 of NIST's publication Recommendation for Block Cipher Modes of Operation: Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) and GMAC:

In Step 8, the result of Step 7 is compared with the authentication tag that was received as an input: if they are identical, then the plaintext is returned; otherwise,FAIL is returned.

This is seems correctly addressed in the AES GCM SIV implementation, where the decrypted buffer is encrypted again before the error is returned - this fix is straightforward to implement in AES GCM. To ensure that these types of cases are covered during testing, it would be valuable to add test cases like 23, 24 etc from project wycheproof to ensure that when a bad tag is used, there is an error on decryption and that the plaintext value is not exposed.

PoC

To reproduce this issue, I'm using test case 23 from project wycheproof.

    let key = GenericArray::from_slice(&hex!("000102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f"));
    let nonce = GenericArray::from_slice(&hex!("505152535455565758595a5b"));
    let tag = GenericArray::from_slice(&hex!("d9847dbc326a06e988c77ad3863e6083")); // bad tag
    let mut ct = hex!("eb156d081ed6b6b55f4612f021d87b39");
    let msg = hex!("202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f");
    let aad = hex!("");
    let cipher = Aes128Gcm::new(&key);
    let _plaintext = cipher.decrypt_in_place_detached(&nonce, &aad, &mut ct, &tag);
    assert_eq!(ct, msg);

openssl: Use-After-Free in `Md::fetch` and `Cipher::fetch`

RUSTSEC-2025-0022

When a Some(...) value was passed to the properties argument of either of these functions, a use-after-free would result.

In practice this would nearly always result in OpenSSL treating the properties as an empty string (due to CString::drop's behavior).

The maintainers thank quitbug for reporting this vulnerability to us.