This project might be open to known security vulnerabilities, which can be prevented by tightening the version range of affected dependencies. Find detailed information at the bottom.

Crate tokio-websockets

Dependencies

(22 total, 4 outdated, 4 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 aws-lc-rs^11.16.2up to date
 base64^0.220.22.1up to date
 bytes ⚠️^1.71.11.1maybe insecure
 fastrand^2.02.3.0up to date
 futures-core^0.30.3.32up to date
 futures-sink^0.30.3.32up to date
 getrandom^0.30.4.2out of date
 http^11.4.0up to date
 httparse^1.61.10.1up to date
 openssl ⚠️^0.100.10.76maybe insecure
 rand^0.90.10.0out of date
 ring ⚠️^0.170.17.14maybe insecure
 rustls-native-certs^0.80.8.3up to date
 rustls-pki-types^11.14.0up to date
 rustls-platform-verifier^0.50.6.2out of date
 sha1_smol^1.01.0.1up to date
 simdutf8^0.10.1.5up to date
 tokio ⚠️^11.50.0maybe insecure
 tokio-native-tls^0.30.3.1up to date
 tokio-rustls^0.260.26.4up to date
 tokio-util^0.7.30.7.18up to date
 webpki-roots^0.261.0.6out of date

Dev dependencies

(5 total, 1 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 futures-util^0.3.140.3.32up to date
 rustls-pemfile^22.2.0up to date
 rustls-pki-types^11.14.0up to date
 tokio ⚠️^11.50.0maybe insecure
 tokio-rustls^0.260.26.4up to date

Security Vulnerabilities

tokio: reject_remote_clients Configuration corruption

RUSTSEC-2023-0001

On Windows, configuring a named pipe server with pipe_mode will force ServerOptions::reject_remote_clients as false.

This drops any intended explicit configuration for the reject_remote_clients that may have been set as true previously.

The default setting of reject_remote_clients is normally true meaning the default is also overridden as false.

Workarounds

Ensure that pipe_mode is set first after initializing a ServerOptions. For example:

let mut opts = ServerOptions::new();
opts.pipe_mode(PipeMode::Message);
opts.reject_remote_clients(true);

ring: Some AES functions may panic when overflow checking is enabled.

RUSTSEC-2025-0009

ring::aead::quic::HeaderProtectionKey::new_mask() may panic when overflow checking is enabled. In the QUIC protocol, an attacker can induce this panic by sending a specially-crafted packet. Even unintentionally it is likely to occur in 1 out of every 2**32 packets sent and/or received.

On 64-bit targets operations using ring::aead::{AES_128_GCM, AES_256_GCM} may panic when overflow checking is enabled, when encrypting/decrypting approximately 68,719,476,700 bytes (about 64 gigabytes) of data in a single chunk. Protocols like TLS and SSH are not affected by this because those protocols break large amounts of data into small chunks. Similarly, most applications will not attempt to encrypt/decrypt 64GB of data in one chunk.

Overflow checking is not enabled in release mode by default, but RUSTFLAGS="-C overflow-checks" or overflow-checks = true in the Cargo.toml profile can override this. Overflow checking is usually enabled by default in debug mode.

openssl: Use-After-Free in `Md::fetch` and `Cipher::fetch`

RUSTSEC-2025-0022

When a Some(...) value was passed to the properties argument of either of these functions, a use-after-free would result.

In practice this would nearly always result in OpenSSL treating the properties as an empty string (due to CString::drop's behavior).

The maintainers thank quitbug for reporting this vulnerability to us.

bytes: Integer overflow in `BytesMut::reserve`

RUSTSEC-2026-0007

In the unique reclaim path of BytesMut::reserve, the condition

if v_capacity >= new_cap + offset

uses an unchecked addition. When new_cap + offset overflows usize in release builds, this condition may incorrectly pass, causing self.cap to be set to a value that exceeds the actual allocated capacity. Subsequent APIs such as spare_capacity_mut() then trust this corrupted cap value and may create out-of-bounds slices, leading to UB.

This behavior is observable in release builds (integer overflow wraps), whereas debug builds panic due to overflow checks.

PoC

use bytes::*;

fn main() {
    let mut a = BytesMut::from(&b"hello world"[..]);
    let mut b = a.split_off(5);

    // Ensure b becomes the unique owner of the backing storage
    drop(a);

    // Trigger overflow in new_cap + offset inside reserve
    b.reserve(usize::MAX - 6);

    // This call relies on the corrupted cap and may cause UB & HBO
    b.put_u8(b'h');
}

Workarounds

Users of BytesMut::reserve are only affected if integer overflow checks are configured to wrap. When integer overflow is configured to panic, this issue does not apply.