This project contains known security vulnerabilities. Find detailed information at the bottom.

Crate testcontainers

Dependencies

(25 total, 6 outdated, 1 insecure, 2 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 async-trait^0.10.1.89up to date
 bollard^0.17.00.20.2out of date
 bollard-stubs=1.45.0-rc.26.0.11.41.0up to date
 bytes ⚠️^1.6.01.11.1maybe insecure
 conquer-once^0.40.4.0up to date
 docker_credential^1.3.11.3.2up to date
 either^1.12.01.15.0up to date
 etcetera^0.8.00.11.0out of date
 futures^0.30.3.32up to date
 log^0.40.4.29up to date
 memchr^2.7.22.8.0up to date
 parse-display^0.9.00.10.0out of date
 pin-project-lite^0.2.140.2.17up to date
 reqwest^0.12.50.13.2out of date
 serde^11.0.228up to date
 serde-java-properties^0.2.00.2.0up to date
 serde_json^11.0.149up to date
 serde_with^3.7.03.18.0up to date
 signal-hook^0.30.4.4out of date
 thiserror^1.0.602.0.18out of date
 tokio ⚠️^11.51.0maybe insecure
 tokio-stream^0.1.150.1.18up to date
 tokio-tar ⚠️^0.3.10.3.1insecure
 tokio-util^0.7.100.7.18up to date
 url^22.5.8up to date

Dev dependencies

(5 total, 2 outdated, 1 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 anyhow^1.0.861.0.102up to date
 pretty_env_logger^0.50.5.0up to date
 reqwest^0.12.40.13.2out of date
 temp-dir^0.1.130.2.0out of date
 tokio ⚠️^11.51.0maybe insecure

Security Vulnerabilities

tokio: reject_remote_clients Configuration corruption

RUSTSEC-2023-0001

On Windows, configuring a named pipe server with pipe_mode will force ServerOptions::reject_remote_clients as false.

This drops any intended explicit configuration for the reject_remote_clients that may have been set as true previously.

The default setting of reject_remote_clients is normally true meaning the default is also overridden as false.

Workarounds

Ensure that pipe_mode is set first after initializing a ServerOptions. For example:

let mut opts = ServerOptions::new();
opts.pipe_mode(PipeMode::Message);
opts.reject_remote_clients(true);

tokio-tar: `tokio-tar` parses PAX extended headers incorrectly, allows file smuggling

RUSTSEC-2025-0111

The archive reader incorrectly handles PAX extended headers, when the ustar header incorrectly specifies zero size (size=000000000000), while a PAX header specifies a non-zero size, tokio-tar::Archive is going to read the file content as tar entry header.

This can be used by a tar file to present different content to tokio-tar compared to other tar reader implementations.

This bug is also known as CVE-2025-62518 and GHSA-j5gw-2vrg-8fgx, as those crates share a common ancestor codebase.

The tokio-tar crate is archived and no longer maintained, we recommend you switch to an alternative crate such as:

bytes: Integer overflow in `BytesMut::reserve`

RUSTSEC-2026-0007

In the unique reclaim path of BytesMut::reserve, the condition

if v_capacity >= new_cap + offset

uses an unchecked addition. When new_cap + offset overflows usize in release builds, this condition may incorrectly pass, causing self.cap to be set to a value that exceeds the actual allocated capacity. Subsequent APIs such as spare_capacity_mut() then trust this corrupted cap value and may create out-of-bounds slices, leading to UB.

This behavior is observable in release builds (integer overflow wraps), whereas debug builds panic due to overflow checks.

PoC

use bytes::*;

fn main() {
    let mut a = BytesMut::from(&b"hello world"[..]);
    let mut b = a.split_off(5);

    // Ensure b becomes the unique owner of the backing storage
    drop(a);

    // Trigger overflow in new_cap + offset inside reserve
    b.reserve(usize::MAX - 6);

    // This call relies on the corrupted cap and may cause UB & HBO
    b.put_u8(b'h');
}

Workarounds

Users of BytesMut::reserve are only affected if integer overflow checks are configured to wrap. When integer overflow is configured to panic, this issue does not apply.