This project might be open to known security vulnerabilities, which can be prevented by tightening the version range of affected dependencies. Find detailed information at the bottom.

Crate rumqttc

Dependencies

(17 total, 9 outdated, 3 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 async-http-proxy^1.2.51.2.5up to date
 async-tungstenite^0.220.33.0out of date
 bytes ⚠️^1.01.11.1maybe insecure
 flume^0.100.12.0out of date
 futures^0.30.3.32up to date
 http^0.21.4.0out of date
 log^0.40.4.29up to date
 native-tls^0.2.80.2.18up to date
 rustls-native-certs^0.60.8.3out of date
 rustls-pemfile^12.2.0out of date
 rustls-webpki ⚠️^0.100.10.103.9out of date
 thiserror^12.0.18out of date
 tokio ⚠️^1.01.50.0maybe insecure
 tokio-native-tls^0.3.00.3.1up to date
 tokio-rustls^0.240.26.4out of date
 url^22.5.8up to date
 ws_stream_tungstenite^0.100.15.0out of date

Dev dependencies

(9 total, 5 outdated, 2 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 bincode^1.3.33.0.0out of date
 color-backtrace^0.40.7.2out of date
 matches^0.10.1.10up to date
 pretty_assertions^11.4.1up to date
 pretty_env_logger^0.40.5.0out of date
 rustls ⚠️^0.210.23.37out of date
 rustls-native-certs^0.60.8.3out of date
 serde^11.0.228up to date
 tokio ⚠️^11.50.0maybe insecure

Security Vulnerabilities

tokio: reject_remote_clients Configuration corruption

RUSTSEC-2023-0001

On Windows, configuring a named pipe server with pipe_mode will force ServerOptions::reject_remote_clients as false.

This drops any intended explicit configuration for the reject_remote_clients that may have been set as true previously.

The default setting of reject_remote_clients is normally true meaning the default is also overridden as false.

Workarounds

Ensure that pipe_mode is set first after initializing a ServerOptions. For example:

let mut opts = ServerOptions::new();
opts.pipe_mode(PipeMode::Message);
opts.reject_remote_clients(true);

rustls-webpki: rustls-webpki: CPU denial of service in certificate path building

RUSTSEC-2023-0053

When this crate is given a pathological certificate chain to validate, it will spend CPU time exponential with the number of candidate certificates at each step of path building.

Both TLS clients and TLS servers that accept client certificate are affected.

We now give each path building operation a budget of 100 signature verifications.

The original webpki crate is also affected.

This was previously reported in the original crate https://github.com/briansmith/webpki/issues/69 and re-reported to us recently by Luke Malinowski.

rustls: `rustls::ConnectionCommon::complete_io` could fall into an infinite loop based on network input

RUSTSEC-2024-0336

If a close_notify alert is received during a handshake, complete_io does not terminate.

Callers which do not call complete_io are not affected.

rustls-tokio and rustls-ffi do not call complete_io and are not affected.

rustls::Stream and rustls::StreamOwned types use complete_io and are affected.

bytes: Integer overflow in `BytesMut::reserve`

RUSTSEC-2026-0007

In the unique reclaim path of BytesMut::reserve, the condition

if v_capacity >= new_cap + offset

uses an unchecked addition. When new_cap + offset overflows usize in release builds, this condition may incorrectly pass, causing self.cap to be set to a value that exceeds the actual allocated capacity. Subsequent APIs such as spare_capacity_mut() then trust this corrupted cap value and may create out-of-bounds slices, leading to UB.

This behavior is observable in release builds (integer overflow wraps), whereas debug builds panic due to overflow checks.

PoC

use bytes::*;

fn main() {
    let mut a = BytesMut::from(&b"hello world"[..]);
    let mut b = a.split_off(5);

    // Ensure b becomes the unique owner of the backing storage
    drop(a);

    // Trigger overflow in new_cap + offset inside reserve
    b.reserve(usize::MAX - 6);

    // This call relies on the corrupted cap and may cause UB & HBO
    b.put_u8(b'h');
}

Workarounds

Users of BytesMut::reserve are only affected if integer overflow checks are configured to wrap. When integer overflow is configured to panic, this issue does not apply.