This project contains known security vulnerabilities. Find detailed information at the bottom.

Crate hdfs-native

Dependencies

(20 total, 8 outdated, 1 insecure, 2 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 base64^0.210.22.1out of date
 bytes ⚠️^11.12.1maybe insecure
 crc^33.4.0up to date
 futures^0.30.3.32up to date
 g2p^11.2.2up to date
 gsasl-sys^0.20.2.4up to date
 libc^0.20.2.186up to date
 libgssapi^0.60.11.0out of date
 log^0.40.4.33up to date
 num-traits^0.20.2.19up to date
 prost^0.110.14.4out of date
 prost-types^0.110.14.4out of date
 roxmltree^0.180.21.1out of date
 socket2^0.50.6.5out of date
 thiserror^12.0.18out of date
 tokio ⚠️^11.52.3maybe insecure
 url^22.5.8up to date
 users ⚠️^0.110.11.0insecure
 uuid^11.23.5up to date
 which^48.0.4out of date

Dev dependencies

(5 total, 4 outdated)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 criterion^0.50.8.2out of date
 env_logger^0.100.11.11out of date
 serial_test^2.0.03.5.0out of date
 tempfile^33.27.0up to date
 which^48.0.4out of date

Security Vulnerabilities

tokio: reject_remote_clients Configuration corruption

RUSTSEC-2023-0001

On Windows, configuring a named pipe server with pipe_mode will force ServerOptions::reject_remote_clients as false.

This drops any intended explicit configuration for the reject_remote_clients that may have been set as true previously.

The default setting of reject_remote_clients is normally true meaning the default is also overridden as false.

Workarounds

Ensure that pipe_mode is set first after initializing a ServerOptions. For example:

let mut opts = ServerOptions::new();
opts.pipe_mode(PipeMode::Message);
opts.reject_remote_clients(true);

users: `root` appended to group listings

RUSTSEC-2025-0040

Affected versions append root to group listings, unless the correct listing has exactly 1024 groups.

This affects both:

  • The supplementary groups of a user
  • The group access list of the current process

If the caller uses this information for access control, this may lead to privilege escalation.

This crate is not currently maintained, so a patched version is not available.

Versions older than 0.8.0 do not contain the affected functions, so downgrading to them is a workaround.

Recommended alternatives

  • uzers (an actively maintained fork of the users crate)
  • sysinfo

bytes: Integer overflow in `BytesMut::reserve`

RUSTSEC-2026-0007

In the unique reclaim path of BytesMut::reserve, the condition

if v_capacity >= new_cap + offset

uses an unchecked addition. When new_cap + offset overflows usize in release builds, this condition may incorrectly pass, causing self.cap to be set to a value that exceeds the actual allocated capacity. Subsequent APIs such as spare_capacity_mut() then trust this corrupted cap value and may create out-of-bounds slices, leading to UB.

This behavior is observable in release builds (integer overflow wraps), whereas debug builds panic due to overflow checks.

PoC

use bytes::*;

fn main() {
    let mut a = BytesMut::from(&b"hello world"[..]);
    let mut b = a.split_off(5);

    // Ensure b becomes the unique owner of the backing storage
    drop(a);

    // Trigger overflow in new_cap + offset inside reserve
    b.reserve(usize::MAX - 6);

    // This call relies on the corrupted cap and may cause UB & HBO
    b.put_u8(b'h');
}

Workarounds

Users of BytesMut::reserve are only affected if integer overflow checks are configured to wrap. When integer overflow is configured to panic, this issue does not apply.