This project might be open to known security vulnerabilities, which can be prevented by tightening the version range of affected dependencies. Find detailed information at the bottom.

Crate axum-extra

Dependencies

(27 total, 5 outdated, 2 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 axum^0.7.60.8.8out of date
 axum-core^0.4.40.5.6out of date
 axum-macros^0.4.20.5.0out of date
 bytes ⚠️^1.1.01.11.1maybe insecure
 cookie^0.18.00.18.1up to date
 form_urlencoded^1.1.01.2.2up to date
 futures-util^0.30.3.32up to date
 headers^0.4.00.4.1up to date
 http^1.0.01.4.0up to date
 http-body^1.0.01.0.1up to date
 http-body-util^0.1.00.1.3up to date
 mime^0.30.3.17up to date
 multer^3.0.03.1.0up to date
 percent-encoding^2.12.3.2up to date
 pin-project-lite^0.20.2.17up to date
 prost^0.120.14.3out of date
 serde^1.01.0.228up to date
 serde_html_form^0.2.00.4.0out of date
 serde_json^1.0.711.0.149up to date
 serde_path_to_error^0.1.80.1.20up to date
 tokio ⚠️^1.191.50.0maybe insecure
 tokio-stream^0.1.90.1.18up to date
 tokio-util^0.70.7.18up to date
 tower^0.5.10.5.3up to date
 tower-layer^0.30.3.3up to date
 tower-service^0.30.3.3up to date
 tracing^0.1.370.1.44up to date

Dev dependencies

(8 total, 2 outdated, 1 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 axum^0.7.20.8.8out of date
 hyper^1.0.01.8.1up to date
 reqwest^0.120.13.2out of date
 serde^1.01.0.228up to date
 serde_json^1.0.711.0.149up to date
 tokio ⚠️^1.141.50.0maybe insecure
 tower^0.5.10.5.3up to date
 tower-http^0.6.00.6.8up to date

Security Vulnerabilities

tokio: reject_remote_clients Configuration corruption

RUSTSEC-2023-0001

On Windows, configuring a named pipe server with pipe_mode will force ServerOptions::reject_remote_clients as false.

This drops any intended explicit configuration for the reject_remote_clients that may have been set as true previously.

The default setting of reject_remote_clients is normally true meaning the default is also overridden as false.

Workarounds

Ensure that pipe_mode is set first after initializing a ServerOptions. For example:

let mut opts = ServerOptions::new();
opts.pipe_mode(PipeMode::Message);
opts.reject_remote_clients(true);

bytes: Integer overflow in `BytesMut::reserve`

RUSTSEC-2026-0007

In the unique reclaim path of BytesMut::reserve, the condition

if v_capacity >= new_cap + offset

uses an unchecked addition. When new_cap + offset overflows usize in release builds, this condition may incorrectly pass, causing self.cap to be set to a value that exceeds the actual allocated capacity. Subsequent APIs such as spare_capacity_mut() then trust this corrupted cap value and may create out-of-bounds slices, leading to UB.

This behavior is observable in release builds (integer overflow wraps), whereas debug builds panic due to overflow checks.

PoC

use bytes::*;

fn main() {
    let mut a = BytesMut::from(&b"hello world"[..]);
    let mut b = a.split_off(5);

    // Ensure b becomes the unique owner of the backing storage
    drop(a);

    // Trigger overflow in new_cap + offset inside reserve
    b.reserve(usize::MAX - 6);

    // This call relies on the corrupted cap and may cause UB & HBO
    b.put_u8(b'h');
}

Workarounds

Users of BytesMut::reserve are only affected if integer overflow checks are configured to wrap. When integer overflow is configured to panic, this issue does not apply.