This project might be open to known security vulnerabilities, which can be prevented by tightening the version range of affected dependencies. Find detailed information at the bottom.

Crate actix-tls

Dependencies

(19 total, 4 outdated, 3 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 actix-rt^2.22.11.0up to date
 actix-service^22.0.3up to date
 actix-utils^33.0.1up to date
 futures-core^0.3.70.3.32up to date
 http^11.4.2up to date
 impl-more^0.10.3.1out of date
 pin-project-lite^0.2.70.2.17up to date
 rustls ⚠️^0.21.60.23.40out of date
 rustls-native-certs^0.80.8.4up to date
 rustls-pki-types^11.14.1up to date
 rustls-webpki ⚠️^0.101.40.103.13out of date
 openssl ⚠️^0.10.550.10.80maybe insecure
 tokio^1.44.21.52.3up to date
 tokio-native-tls^0.30.3.1up to date
 tokio-openssl^0.60.6.5up to date
 tokio-rustls^0.260.26.4up to date
 tokio-util^0.70.7.18up to date
 tracing^0.1.300.1.44up to date
 webpki-roots^0.261.0.7out of date

Dev dependencies

(11 total, 2 outdated, 1 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 actix-codec^0.50.5.2up to date
 actix-rt^2.22.11.0up to date
 actix-server^22.6.0up to date
 bytes ⚠️^11.11.1maybe insecure
 futures-util^0.3.170.3.32up to date
 hickory-resolver^0.250.26.1out of date
 itertools^0.140.14.0up to date
 pretty_env_logger^0.50.5.0up to date
 rcgen^0.130.14.8out of date
 rustls-pemfile^22.2.0up to date
 tokio-rustls^0.260.26.4up to date

Security Vulnerabilities

rustls: `rustls::ConnectionCommon::complete_io` could fall into an infinite loop based on network input

RUSTSEC-2024-0336

If a close_notify alert is received during a handshake, complete_io does not terminate.

Callers which do not call complete_io are not affected.

rustls-tokio and rustls-ffi do not call complete_io and are not affected.

rustls::Stream and rustls::StreamOwned types use complete_io and are affected.

openssl: Use-After-Free in `Md::fetch` and `Cipher::fetch`

RUSTSEC-2025-0022

When a Some(...) value was passed to the properties argument of either of these functions, a use-after-free would result.

In practice this would nearly always result in OpenSSL treating the properties as an empty string (due to CString::drop's behavior).

The maintainers thank quitbug for reporting this vulnerability to us.

bytes: Integer overflow in `BytesMut::reserve`

RUSTSEC-2026-0007

In the unique reclaim path of BytesMut::reserve, the condition

if v_capacity >= new_cap + offset

uses an unchecked addition. When new_cap + offset overflows usize in release builds, this condition may incorrectly pass, causing self.cap to be set to a value that exceeds the actual allocated capacity. Subsequent APIs such as spare_capacity_mut() then trust this corrupted cap value and may create out-of-bounds slices, leading to UB.

This behavior is observable in release builds (integer overflow wraps), whereas debug builds panic due to overflow checks.

PoC

use bytes::*;

fn main() {
    let mut a = BytesMut::from(&b"hello world"[..]);
    let mut b = a.split_off(5);

    // Ensure b becomes the unique owner of the backing storage
    drop(a);

    // Trigger overflow in new_cap + offset inside reserve
    b.reserve(usize::MAX - 6);

    // This call relies on the corrupted cap and may cause UB & HBO
    b.put_u8(b'h');
}

Workarounds

Users of BytesMut::reserve are only affected if integer overflow checks are configured to wrap. When integer overflow is configured to panic, this issue does not apply.

rustls-webpki: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted

RUSTSEC-2026-0098

Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.

Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented. URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.

Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.

This vulnerability is identified as GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5. Thank you to @1seal for the report.

rustls-webpki: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name

RUSTSEC-2026-0099

Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.

This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of accept.example.com, *.example.com could feasibly allow a name of reject.example.com which is outside the constraint. This is very similar to CVE-2025-61727.

Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.

This vulnerability is identified as GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh. Thank you to @1seal for the report.

rustls-webpki: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing

RUSTSEC-2026-0104

A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der] or [OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der]. This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty BIT STRING appearing in the onlySomeReasons element of a IssuingDistributionPoint CRL extension.

This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.

Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.

Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.