This project contains known security vulnerabilities. Find detailed information at the bottom.

Crate quadit

Dependencies

(15 total, 1 insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 anyhow^1.0.1001.0.102up to date
 quaditsync^1.0.21.0.2up to date
 serde^1.0.2281.0.228up to date
 serde_yaml^0.9.340.9.34+deprecatedup to date
 tokio-cron-scheduler^0.15.10.15.1up to date
 uuid^1.19.01.22.0up to date
 tokio^1.49.01.50.0up to date
 dotenvy^0.15.70.15.7up to date
 chrono^0.4.420.4.44up to date
 tracing^0.1.440.1.44up to date
 tracing-subscriber^0.3.220.3.23up to date
 url^2.5.72.5.8up to date
 users ⚠️^0.110.11.0insecure
 reqwest^0.13.10.13.2up to date
 dirs^6.0.06.0.0up to date

Dev dependencies

(3 total, 1 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 claims^0.8.00.8.0up to date
 time ⚠️^0.3.440.3.47maybe insecure
 timer^0.2.00.2.0up to date

Security Vulnerabilities

users: `root` appended to group listings

RUSTSEC-2025-0040

Affected versions append root to group listings, unless the correct listing has exactly 1024 groups.

This affects both:

  • The supplementary groups of a user
  • The group access list of the current process

If the caller uses this information for access control, this may lead to privilege escalation.

This crate is not currently maintained, so a patched version is not available.

Versions older than 0.8.0 do not contain the affected functions, so downgrading to them is a workaround.

Recommended alternatives

  • uzers (an actively maintained fork of the users crate)
  • sysinfo

time: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion

RUSTSEC-2026-0009

Impact

When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary, non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.

Patches

A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned rather than exhausting the stack.

Workarounds

Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.