This project might be open to known security vulnerabilities, which can be prevented by tightening the version range of affected dependencies. Find detailed information at the bottom.

Crate tokio-file

Dependencies

(5 total, 3 outdated, 1 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 futures^0.1.100.3.30out of date
 mio^0.6.130.8.11out of date
 mio-aio^0.4.10.8.0out of date
 nix ⚠️0.*, >=0.12.10.28.0maybe insecure
 tokio-reactor^0.1.60.1.12up to date

Dev dependencies

(7 total, 4 outdated, 1 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 divbuf^0.3.10.3.1up to date
 futures^0.10.3.30out of date
 galvanic-test^0.1.50.2.0out of date
 getopts^0.20.2.21up to date
 sysctl^0.10.5.5out of date
 tempdir^0.30.3.7up to date
 tokio ⚠️^0.1.61.37.0out of date

Security Vulnerabilities

nix: Out-of-bounds write in nix::unistd::getgrouplist

RUSTSEC-2021-0119

On certain platforms, if a user has more than 16 groups, the nix::unistd::getgrouplist function will call the libc getgrouplist function with a length parameter greater than the size of the buffer it provides, resulting in an out-of-bounds write and memory corruption.

The libc getgrouplist function takes an in/out parameter ngroups specifying the size of the group buffer. When the buffer is too small to hold all of the requested user's group memberships, some libc implementations, including glibc and Solaris libc, will modify ngroups to indicate the actual number of groups for the user, in addition to returning an error. The version of nix::unistd::getgrouplist in nix 0.16.0 and up will resize the buffer to twice its size, but will not read or modify the ngroups variable. Thus, if the user has more than twice as many groups as the initial buffer size of 8, the next call to getgrouplist will then write past the end of the buffer.

The issue would require editing /etc/groups to exploit, which is usually only editable by the root user.

tokio: Data race when sending and receiving after closing a `oneshot` channel

RUSTSEC-2021-0124

If a tokio::sync::oneshot channel is closed (via the oneshot::Receiver::close method), a data race may occur if the oneshot::Sender::send method is called while the corresponding oneshot::Receiver is awaited or calling try_recv.

When these methods are called concurrently on a closed channel, the two halves of the channel can concurrently access a shared memory location, resulting in a data race. This has been observed to cause memory corruption.

Note that the race only occurs when both halves of the channel are used after the Receiver half has called close. Code where close is not used, or where the Receiver is not awaited and try_recv is not called after calling close, is not affected.

See tokio#4225 for more details.