This project might be open to known security vulnerabilities, which can be prevented by tightening the version range of affected dependencies. Find detailed information at the bottom.

Crate scuffle-http

Dependencies

(28 total, 5 outdated, 4 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 async-trait^0.10.1.89up to date
 axum-core^0.40.5.6out of date
 bytes ⚠️^11.11.1maybe insecure
 derive_more^1.0.02.1.1out of date
 futures^0.30.3.32up to date
 h3^00.0.8up to date
 h3-quinn^00.0.10up to date
 http^11.4.0up to date
 http-body^11.0.1up to date
 httpdate^11.0.3up to date
 hyper^1.5.11.8.1up to date
 hyper-util^0.1.100.1.20up to date
 itoa^11.0.18up to date
 libc^0.20.2.183up to date
 pin-project-lite^0.20.2.17up to date
 quinn^0.110.11.9up to date
 rustls ⚠️^0.230.23.37maybe insecure
 rustls-pemfile^2.22.2.0up to date
 scuffle-context^0.0.20.1.5out of date
 scuffle-h3-webtransport^0.0.20.1.1out of date
 scuffle-workspace-hack^0.1.00.1.0up to date
 smallvec ⚠️^11.15.1maybe insecure
 spin^0.90.10.0out of date
 thiserror^2.0.02.0.18up to date
 tokio ⚠️^11.50.0maybe insecure
 tokio-rustls^0.260.26.4up to date
 tower-service^0.30.3.3up to date
 tracing^0.10.1.44up to date

Security Vulnerabilities

smallvec: Buffer overflow in SmallVec::insert_many

RUSTSEC-2021-0003

A bug in the SmallVec::insert_many method caused it to allocate a buffer that was smaller than needed. It then wrote past the end of the buffer, causing a buffer overflow and memory corruption on the heap.

This bug was only triggered if the iterator passed to insert_many yielded more items than the lower bound returned from its size_hint method.

The flaw was corrected in smallvec 0.6.14 and 1.6.1, by ensuring that additional space is always reserved for each item inserted. The fix also simplified the implementation of insert_many to use less unsafe code, so it is easier to verify its correctness.

Thank you to Yechan Bae (@Qwaz) and the Rust group at Georgia Tech’s SSLab for finding and reporting this bug.

tokio: reject_remote_clients Configuration corruption

RUSTSEC-2023-0001

On Windows, configuring a named pipe server with pipe_mode will force ServerOptions::reject_remote_clients as false.

This drops any intended explicit configuration for the reject_remote_clients that may have been set as true previously.

The default setting of reject_remote_clients is normally true meaning the default is also overridden as false.

Workarounds

Ensure that pipe_mode is set first after initializing a ServerOptions. For example:

let mut opts = ServerOptions::new();
opts.pipe_mode(PipeMode::Message);
opts.reject_remote_clients(true);

rustls: rustls network-reachable panic in `Acceptor::accept`

RUSTSEC-2024-0399

A bug introduced in rustls 0.23.13 leads to a panic if the received TLS ClientHello is fragmented. Only servers that use rustls::server::Acceptor::accept() are affected.

Servers that use tokio-rustls's LazyConfigAcceptor API are affected.

Servers that use tokio-rustls's TlsAcceptor API are not affected.

Servers that use rustls-ffi's rustls_acceptor_accept API are affected.

bytes: Integer overflow in `BytesMut::reserve`

RUSTSEC-2026-0007

In the unique reclaim path of BytesMut::reserve, the condition

if v_capacity >= new_cap + offset

uses an unchecked addition. When new_cap + offset overflows usize in release builds, this condition may incorrectly pass, causing self.cap to be set to a value that exceeds the actual allocated capacity. Subsequent APIs such as spare_capacity_mut() then trust this corrupted cap value and may create out-of-bounds slices, leading to UB.

This behavior is observable in release builds (integer overflow wraps), whereas debug builds panic due to overflow checks.

PoC

use bytes::*;

fn main() {
    let mut a = BytesMut::from(&b"hello world"[..]);
    let mut b = a.split_off(5);

    // Ensure b becomes the unique owner of the backing storage
    drop(a);

    // Trigger overflow in new_cap + offset inside reserve
    b.reserve(usize::MAX - 6);

    // This call relies on the corrupted cap and may cause UB & HBO
    b.put_u8(b'h');
}

Workarounds

Users of BytesMut::reserve are only affected if integer overflow checks are configured to wrap. When integer overflow is configured to panic, this issue does not apply.