This project might be open to known security vulnerabilities, which can be prevented by tightening the version range of affected dependencies. Find detailed information at the bottom.

Crate deno_core

Dependencies

(23 total, 3 outdated, 1 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 anyhow^11.0.83up to date
 bincode^11.3.3up to date
 bit-set^00.5.3up to date
 bit-vec^00.6.3up to date
 bytes^1.4.01.6.0up to date
 cooked-waker^55.0.0up to date
 deno_core_icudata^0.0.730.73.0out of date
 deno_ops^0.154.00.156.0out of date
 deno_unsync^0.3.20.3.3up to date
 futures^0.3.210.3.30up to date
 libc^0.2.1260.2.154up to date
 memoffset>=0.90.9.1up to date
 parking_lot^0.12.00.12.2up to date
 pin-project^11.1.5up to date
 serde^11.0.201up to date
 serde_json^11.0.117up to date
 serde_v8^0.187.00.189.0out of date
 smallvec^1.81.13.2up to date
 sourcemap^88.0.1up to date
 static_assertions^11.1.0up to date
 tokio ⚠️^11.37.0maybe insecure
 url^22.5.0up to date
 v8^0.91.00.91.1up to date

Dev dependencies

(7 total, 1 outdated, 1 possibly insecure)

CrateRequiredLatestStatus
 bencher^0.10.1.5up to date
 criterion^0.50.5.1up to date
 deno_ast=0.35.30.38.1out of date
 fastrand^22.1.0up to date
 pretty_assertions^1.3.01.4.0up to date
 rstest^00.19.0up to date
 unicycle ⚠️^00.10.1maybe insecure

Security Vulnerabilities

unicycle: PinSlab<T> and Unordered<T, S> need bounds on their Send/Sync traits

RUSTSEC-2020-0116

Affected versions of this crate unconditionally implemented Send & Sync for types PinSlab<T> & Unordered<T, S>. This allows sending non-Send types to other threads and concurrently accessing non-Sync types from multiple threads.

This can result in a data race & memory corruption when types that provide internal mutability without synchronization are contained within PinSlab<T> or Unordered<T, S> and accessed concurrently from multiple threads.

The flaw was corrected in commits 92f40b4 & 6a6c367 by adding trait bound T: Send to Send impls for PinSlab<T> & Unordered<T, S> and adding T: Sync to Sync impls for PinSlab<T> & Unordered<T, S>.

tokio: reject_remote_clients Configuration corruption

RUSTSEC-2023-0001

On Windows, configuring a named pipe server with pipe_mode will force ServerOptions::reject_remote_clients as false.

This drops any intended explicit configuration for the reject_remote_clients that may have been set as true previously.

The default setting of reject_remote_clients is normally true meaning the default is also overridden as false.

Workarounds

Ensure that pipe_mode is set first after initializing a ServerOptions. For example:

let mut opts = ServerOptions::new();
opts.pipe_mode(PipeMode::Message);
opts.reject_remote_clients(true);